As the nation has become polarized around the issue of gun control it can be almost impossible to sift fact from opinion. The gun control statistics we research and quote are likely to be accurate, but whether they hint towards more gun control or less is going to be dependent on from which group the statistics come from. If you talk to groups affiliated with The National Rifle Association you will learn that states with the strongest gun control laws, like California, are also states with higher murder rates as a result of guns. Meanwhile, states with very few gun control laws, like Utah, had only 26 murders in 2011 as a result of guns. Therefore, it stands to reason that putting in to place more control is only a catalyst for more crime, or at the least has no bearing on crime rates. Pro gun control groups mi
The debate surrounding the vexing topic of gun control seems like it will never go away. No matter what is done, or not done, by the government will, inevitable, lead to criticism from one side or the other. Of course, much of this can be attributed to many years of dissent regarding gun violence, and where, or on whom, the burden of blame should be placed. Since opponents and proponents of gun control are so emotionally invested in the issue, the only way to get an unbiased perspective is by studying gun control statistics. While gun control statistics, and merely the fact that guns are used in so many violent crimes, makes it easy to point fingers, the problem is not that simple. Despite the number of mass shootings in the United States over recent years, gun control statistics can be misleading. Of course
Much like those on the opposite side of the issue, the pro gun control crowd feels an enormous amount of passion towards their cause. They are also an incredibly diverse group. Some of those in the pro gun control movement want to see certain guns taken off the shelves, while others believe that they should be outlawed entirely. There are a number of gun control statistics that these individuals tout to help get their point across. One set of statistics that the pro gun control crowd likes to discuss is the increase in school shootings over the past two decades. Statistics like these are not exactly shocking to people these days, especially with all of the coverage that the mainstream media gives to them when they occur. However, those that are pro gun control still have a hard time showing that legal gun ownership is the problem. Those individuals that are against further gun control measures show how the majority of the gun problems in this country come not from legal gun owners, but from criminals, thugs and gang members with illegal guns. Many of these crimes occur in California, Illinois and New York, the states with the strongest gun control laws in the nation. Stats like these have a way of hampering the pro gun control argument. Many of those that passionately support the pro gun control argument have been or know victims of gun violence. They have may had friends or children that fell prey to an accident involving a gun. It is the kind of accident that is most often preventable, which makes it all the more heartbreaking. While the pro gun control and pro gun safety crowds may clash, many still hope that they can come together to find common ground.
Anyone that is interested or curious about the history of gun control in America will probably find themselves in for quite a bit of reading. Whether they are anti or pro gun control, they will see that there have been tons of developments, especially over the last century. Before one really examines the stats, they may first want to look at why the United States has a culture that is so ingrained with guns. America was a frontier nation. Guns were needed not just to defend oneself, but to survive and catch food. Later on, during the time of the Revolutionary War, arms were necessary against what the majority considered to be an oppressive and tyrannical government. People kept the belief (and many still do) that without their guns, they would always be victims to a government that overreaches, invades their privacy, or may wish to do them harm. Gun control in America did not happen overnight. In fact, it happened quite slowly. At first, a few laws in states like New York made their way in, slowly restricting the types of guns that people could own. Other bills restricted the ways that firearms could be transported. These laws, written by people touting gun control statistics, soon started deciding what kind of guns people could own altogether. Some guns, such as “assault rifles” became outlawed entirely. Now there are efforts to restrict gun ownership on a federal level. For some people, it is a matter of public safety, while for others, it is about ridding the country they love of something they believe to not be necessary. One thing that is for certain however, is that guns are woven into the fabric of America. Despite the passion that some feel for gun control, it is highly unlikely that they will ever be given up by those that love and use them.
Gun control statistics in recent years have been especially helpful for pro gun control advocates. However, these statistics on gun control as well have proved useful for those who are entirely against having any stricter or stronger restrictions on the purchase, sale, and use of guns in this country. In short, both sides stand to benefit from using these gun control statistics to support their individual arguments, which are both for and against stronger gun control laws. When people like the idea of stronger and more enforcing restrictions on guns in this country, there are gun control statistics that will point to the fact that gun violence is something that is prevalent in our country and that without stronger restrictions this country will simply downward spiral into a society that fully supports guns in any way possible. They will use these gun control statistics to show both the other side and people on the fence that without stronger gun laws, people will continue to rise further and further up the amoral ladder. And in large part, they will gain the followers they have wanted to get because they have used gun control statistics that have pointed toward their argument, essentially supporting it wholeheartedly. When people are very much against the idea that guns should be controlled at all in this country, there are gun control statistics that of course will assist in supporting this argument as well. These statistics will point to the idea that nothing really will change should the country adopt stronger laws, and in fact it would just cause more traffic in Congress and more illegal purchase and sale of guns. They would argue, then, that people would find ways to get guns into their hands if they really wanted to. And in an interesting way, with the gun control statistics they have, they may very well just be right. These are not merely people who are twisting the truth just to support whatever stance they are taking. There are gun control statistics that truly support both sides, which is why this debate is so long fought and so emotionally charged too. People use them frequently in essays in school, on debate floors in government lobbies and in corporate board rooms too. They have used them for years and will continue their use of them as long as these statistics to both support and deny reasons for stronger control of guns are out there.
Gun control has been one of the most polarizing of all controversies for many years. However, this has never been more true since the 1980s. But, over time, it always seems that the controversy takes a back seat to other issues, until a tragic event that occurs due to a firearm catapults gun control into the spot light. Given the number of mass tragedies committed with firearms that have occurred every few months over the past couple of years, the furor has been loud and steady. As a result, the first significant gun control laws, possibly ever, have been passes over the winter of 2013. Nonetheless, gun control still has a way to go before pro gun control advocates are satisfied. The toughest battle that gun control advocates face time after time, is the Second Amendment. Of course, the right to bear arms has been viewed as one of the very basic rights of United States citizens since the birth of the country. As such, the NRA and its staunch supporters have practically immobilized the calls for gun control, regardless of the gun control statistics used as support it. However, over the past six months, assault rifles have once again been banned, as have clips that hold more than 10 rounds. Still, it seems that calls for gun regulation have once again stalled, after it seemed something big was coming. And as always, it is due to the fact that the Second Amendment is written in such a way, that it is specific enough to express the rights of citizens, but vague enough to deflect scrutiny from opponents. There may never be any significant laws to regulate firearms, because the Second Amendment is that strong. However, most gun rights supporters already believe that gun control does exist, because they do not have rights to own any type of gun or ammunition that they desire. Still, one would be hard pressed to find a gun control advocate who would concur with this claim. In fact, until every type of firearm and ammunition is outlawed in the United States, most gun control advocates will continue to feel slighted.
If you were to name one of the top hot topics in the US right now, one of them would probably be gun control debate. There have been multiple recent highly publicized issues that make people wonder whether the right move is to arm more citizens with guns, or put more restrictions on gun ownership so that the likelihood of people who will do harm with them is lessened. Personally, I am pro gun control. And that is a controversial position, I realize. So instead of just saying why I am pro gun control, I will instead explain why I am against everyone having easy access to guns. First, gun control statistics. A lot of people argue that people intent on doing harm will obtain guns through illegal methods, and that the only effect of getting rid of guns would be that innocent people have no real way of defending themselves against illegally obtained guns and the criminals who wield them. It is a convincing argument, and yet the concept of illegal guns is not hypothetical. Many countries have stronger laws concerning gun ownership than we do. And for multiple countries of all different sizes and varying levels of criminal activity, the results of the gun control statistics are clear. The easier it is to legally obtain guns, the more people are shot, every day. Over the course of a year, this adds up to a higher death toll of hundreds of people. Why might this be, considering the logic of the first group seems reasonable? Supply and demand is probably a large factor. Even if it is possible to obtain guns illegally, it is far more difficult, and comes at a greater expense. Gun control statistics indicate that many gun deaths are the result of impulses rather than planned attacks. Many people who are looking for a way to arm themselves at the last minute, or who cannot afford a thousand dollar black market gun, might still attempt to be violent, but will engage with weaponry that is less likely to be fatal in the way that guns often are. To add to this, I would also point out that there is a reason that police is an occupation and not a role for all citizenry. Gun control statistics show that people not trained in how to shoot guns are more likely to injure themselves or other innocent bystanders.
Gun control is currently the subject of a lot of national debate. Many recent shootings have offered us conflicting feelings on gun control. Is it better to limit access to guns so that potential killers are not as likely to receive them, or make sure that people can protect themselves? There is no easy answer. Many people agree that future tragedies could be prevented by responsible citizenry having access to guns. There are several issues that pro gun control advocates have with this, however. One issue is that gun owners are more likely to shoot and injure, or kill, people they know rather than intruders. This often has to do with people acting on panic and instinct rather than logic when it comes to disarming a potential intruder. Often times a child coming home at late, a spouse rummaging for a late night snack, or having poor aim, result in a too quickly pulled trigger and an unnecessary injury. Pro gun control advocates will point out that the chances of a school shooter coming to any particular college lecture hall are incredibly low, while the likelihood that a scared armed student will accidentally hit someone who is unarmed and mistaken for a shooter, is a lot higher. People acting on impulse is one reason pro gun control advocates desire education and stricter licensing. Several big headline cases lately have shown that white people often perceive black men to be dangerous, especially if they fit a thug stereotype by wearing hoodies and loose jeans. This fact probably surprises few but is a racial issue that becomes exacerbated when white people acting on this socialized fear shoot first, and ask questions about why someone was in a neighborhood later. Many people who do not agree with pro gun control argue that bad people will always find a way to get guns, and the only people really being punished or limited by these laws are honest citizenry. To an extent, this is certainly true, since potential murderers are not likely to respect other laws. However, gun control statistics of other countries that limit or outlaw gun ownership completely, as well as state by state comparisons of where guns are and are not easier to purchase, are highly suggestive and there is a clear relationship between gun control measures that limit legal access, and a decrease in the amount of deaths and injuries by guns.
While gun control has been a controversial and divisive topic for decades, it has never been more so than at this very moment. Given the level of damage that can be done quickly by a single firearm, as epitomized by so many tragic events of the past couple of decades, pro gun control advocates have struggled to penetrate the seemingly impenetrable armor of gun rights groups. Although gun control statistics seem to provide more than enough ammunition to support a gun control offensive, the battle for gun control has been uphill, to say the least. The most difficult obstacle faced for gun control groups, is something called the Second Amendment. Way back during the days of muskets and canon balls, the forefathers of the United States considered gun ownership important enough to warrant making it one of the fundamental rights of all law abiding American citizens. As such, gun ownership has been far and wide since the birth of the United States. However, as firearms technology improved, the potential devastation that became possible via a single firearm reached awesome levels. Due to high capacity magazines and high tech ammunition, the number of high casualty tragedies has reached alarming levels. Thus, those who are in favor of gun control, can turn to gun control statistics to make their case with confidence. Consequently, gun control has gained considerable traction over the first quarter of 2013. Yet, a long battle lies ahead. At this time, the case to regulate, and even outlaw, firearms has never been better from the perspectives of those groups that want to control gun ownership, the battle is far from over. It seems that every time that the fight for gun control takes a step forward, talks stall, no progress is made, and the gun control effort takes three steps back. Regardless of how many tragedies occur due to gun violence, it appears that the strength of the Second Amendment becomes stronger than ever. Nonetheless, gun control advocates should not lose hope, as they can always go back, assess the enemy, and reload.
Shootings might not be up, but reports of them most certainly are. And everyone has an opinion on the gun control issue. And almost all of these opinions are held strongly. Some people assert the need for control, others their Second Amendment rights. Gun control statistics can provide useful insights into this issue. But people should be careful about the gun control statistics on which they rely. An essay presenting gun control statistics can provide information on a wide variety of facts relating to this controversial issue. Of course, no one can provide any single opinion on an issue which is so contentious. Whether it is a discussion of an assault weapons ban or some sort of registry service or roll, it is important to recognize that numerous people have varied levels of knowledge when it comes to commenting on pros and cons of gun control. Furthermore, it is important to recognize that a gun control statistics essay can provide a wide variety of information based on the individual experiences of its author. Many people have numerous different experiences with guns and their safety. Not everyone on either side of the debate is equally knowledgeable. Furthermore, many are familiar with distinct areas of the issue. Some, for example, are familiar with crime but do not participate in hunting to any significant degree. An essay regarding gun control pros and cons can also be an important source for individual citizens looking for ways to ensure their safety, whether this is to learn how to avoid a situation which could escalate and end with someone getting hurt or finding information on where to find a lock for the weapon. Journalism presenting gun control statistics, whether they be pro gun control or anti gun control, is one of the best places to find any information relating to the issue of gun control, and it for this reason that they are growing more visible at a time when gun violence is of increasing concern.